11th March
2010
Lance Armstrong's incredible crash & recovery on stage 15 of the 2003 tour
25 Comments
Leave a Reply
ABOUT
My adventures in bicycling
RECENT POSTS
09th August 2010
09th August 2010
09th August 2010
09th August 2010
09th August 2010
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Aug | ||||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | ||
| 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 |
| 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 |
| 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 |
| 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | |||
hahahahahahahaha
im not laughing at the video, im laughing at the douchebags who are arguing about lance armstrong.
the guy is a legend, all legends have bad moments. Ossy Osboune. Michael Jackson. Lance Armstrong. Collin Farrel.
oh wait. not Colin Farrel. He is not a legend.
Damn audience
Can someone please tell me the name of the song in the background?
As for Kimmage, the man was a good domestique for a number of teams, and helped Nicholas Roche to a World Championship. He also completed a TdF, which deserves an enormous amount of respect. As for being a second-rate journalist, he won various awards for his books and newspaper column, and writes for The Times, one of the most respected newspapers in the world.
And wtf is the ‘anti-lance religion’?
Also, autologous blood transfusing is undetectable by blood tests, so passing a drugs test regardless of whether you are charged should be simple.
I’m not self-righteous, I just don’t see the need to insult people, I don’t know you so why would I insult you?
How do I sound bitter exactly? I started watching the sport straight after Operacion Puerto and read up on cycling so understood that doping was pandemic in cycling, and didn’t really care.
I’m sure you’ve seen me write this already, but please type ‘ashenden’ and ‘nyvelocity’ into google, then go onto the first link. I’m sure the developer of the test for EPO has a far more valid opinion than either of us on whether Armstrong doped or not. The only ‘fact’ you seem to concentrate is that he has never failed a drugs test(even though he has- look at the link). This is irrelevant because the developers of PEDs are continuously developing newer drugs for which there is no test.
@Sam1989allen Lmao, perhaps you should actually read my comments properly, and as for “making valid points”, you haven’t actually made a single one yourself, you just make silly comments without anything factual to back it up, which actually makes you sound like the idiot, and a bitter one at that, so don’t go getting all self righteous on me.
Have you subscribed to the ‘anti-Lance’ religion too? As for Kimmage, he was a 2nd rate pro, and he’s a 2nd rate journalist too.
Please don’t call Paul Kimmage talentless. The man completed a Tour de France. Also, don’t insult people who comment. It detracts from any valid points you make, not that I see any, and makes you sound like an idiot.
No I believe that only Lance doped because there is a lot of books on his doping and no author has been sued for slandering, very uncommon for a so litigious Armstrong.
Doping tests are easily defeated, never was Marion Jones, Virenque, Pantani, and many other riders caught by them. Should we conclude they are reliable and efficient to cacch dopers?
As Kimmage said Lance is the cancer of cycling, his comeback was a bad thing. Better to fight the biggest fraud of sport than a small fish.
@hghepo And fact seems not to be your best ability, all ur figures, graphs & articles mean absolutely fuck all until Lance is caught in a valid dope test.
I laugh at ur ignorant stupidity, of the hundreds of cyclists and other sportsmen & women embroiled in doping, it’s Armstrong alone that you vivlify. Are you a failed cyclist by any chance,or an ex talentless pro like Kimmage? No doubt you have a great future spouting ur mindless bullshit on you-tube…. you fuckin loser,lol.
Wrong again. The 50% limit is a healthy limit !
UCI doesn’t allow to increase hematocrit by exogene meanings. To increase it from 41 to 48% is not doable naturally so that is doping !
It’s not because you are not caught that you don’t cheated.
Why did Lance need a backdated to TUE to clear a negative test? Logic seems to be not your best ability, you have a great future as idiot.
@hghepo You dumb twat, it was a corticosteroid for saddle sores, and it was WITHIN the UCI limits anyway.
The UCI limits for hematocrit are 50%, so yet again …. you fail, Armstrong doesn’t. You can continue to pull all these so called ‘facts’ out of your arse, but the FACT is Armstrong has never failed a dope test, so you and ur friend u368 (I suspect you are the same person)…. keep pushing ur stupid religion because it won’t make the slightest difference, you fuckin sad, bitter loser!
Lance failed a valid dope test : the corticosteroid 1999 case, it was cleared ILLEGALY by UCI breaking his own rules because the AUT should have been on the doping form.
Lance had at the end of his TDF a 48% hematocrit, that can never be obtained by legal meaning for a guy who registred an 41-42% natural values. More damaging proof than a failed doping test. You can continue to grap straws to exonerate Lance, he is a doper as show us all his doping affairs and legal testimonies.
@u368 Durrrrrrrrrrrr, do you spam the same bullshit comments on every video? You pathetic little cocksucker,lol. You’re obviously a clueless little boy who has never been a success at anything, and I suspect the only life you have is bitching about Armstrong. I suggest you go and look up corticosteroids, they are not anabolic, nor are they masking agents, they are commonly used for sports injurys and allergies. The fact is Armstrong has never failed a valid dope test, so get over it you retard.
Check your facts:
Kohl was tested 200 times, Lance was tested around 80 times in the first part of his career (very much less than Zabel, Cippolini or Jalabert) and around 50-60 times since his come-back, much less than successfull riders Contador, Cancellara or Cavendish.
2nd fact: during a retrotesting to validate an EPO test improvement, 8 Lance 2009 TDF samples were found to have exogenous EPO. 6 of them have amount higher than the trigger limit of positivity, the 2 others show undoubtly the use of EPO.
Lance Armstrong had a positive test for corticosteroid for the 1st stage in 1999. At a press conference (2nd rest day), LA responding to EPO use confirmed he had no exemption for any therapeutic usage. 2 days later, his failed test was announced. No TUE mentiooned on doping form but a miraculous and outdated TUE from US Postal doctor appeared. O’Reilly USP masseuse testimonied it was a fake. Lance made a few months later a $500.000 secret donation, revealed in 2005 to UCI.
@PhotoRelax Theres a big difference, Schumacher was penalized many times for cheating, and a secret deal between Ferrari & the F1 governing body ensured he got away with many more shady moves. Schumi didn’t nearly die from cancer, Lance Armstrong did, and he has never failed a dope test even tho he’s the most drug tested rider in the history of the tour de france.
@u368 Fuck off you sad, bitter cunt. Take ur anti-lance religion and shove it up ur ass. Armstrong has NEVER failed a dope test, and that’s a fact.
he won deal with it
incredible recovery
More a Madoff or a Ben Johnson. The best dope user.
Just read Ashenden interview on velocitynation website to learn more about his 6 EPO samples of 1999 TDF.
lance armstrong the micheal schumacher of Tour De France lol
Apologies – I thought you were talking about the first crash !
THERE WERE NO “FRENCH FUCKS” IN THE WAY !
And apart from that, there other thousands upon thousands of other nationalities on the roadside at the TdF.